CI Different From And Similar to Partner Dance; for Interfusion 2017
Following contact points - Neige Christensen and Martin Keogh
Steve Paxton's notes from the early rough-and-tumble days
Diving Into Unknown by Erica Kaufman, conveys inner experience in a workshop.
Contemporary dancers at jam, during a CI anniversary celebration,
I relish the opportunity to introduce Contact Improvisation to others who might wind up loving it as I do. Particularly the movement lovers at Interfusion! But there's a wrinkle. CI is structured differently than other partner dance styles (or martial arts, or meditation, etc.), in fundamental ways. Some of the things you do to learn CI are different than what works for other partner forms, and sometimes in surprising ways.
I love what can happen when things click, and want to do what I can to help people find it. Understanding CI's differences from and similarities to other partner dance can shed light on what CI is and what you do to learn it. I'll describe some essential differences, as well as some underlying similarities, and touch on some commonly taught central skills.
What is Contact Improvisation, and How Is It Different?
Contact improvisation is organized around an elementary premise: partners following a shared point of contact. While that's easy to say, you don't get much of a feel for how it works without actually trying it. However, it's easy to describe how it looks different from other partner practices:
- Contact Improvisation is a sort of partner dance, except there's no set music or steps or rhythms or, really, any set patterns to follow.
- It's sort of a meditation, except you're moving, and sometimes moving really fast and athletically, and often in ways that change over the course of a dance.
- So it's also sorta like a sport or martial art, except that sometimes it's really slow without much movement at all, beyond shared attention. Plus, the aim is never for victory over someone else. In fact, when it works, you're playing for them, and they for you.
- It's even like massage and partner yoga, except you use your whole body to massage or pose with your partner, and vice versa. While (usually, but not always) moving. (-:
How Can It Work?
In most partner dance, partners move closely without getting all tangled up by using style-specific patterns - step sequences, rhythms, postures, pacing, roles and social protocols, and so on. From there, the partners explore and develop skills for inhabiting that particular form of cooperation. CI instead uses that elemental task: following shared points of contact.
In any kind of partner dance, CI or not, when it works, it's exhilarating: cooperation so close and immediate, it's like the coordination that happens between the parts of your own body.
(See the video of Neige and Martin at the top of this article for some nice examples.)
So how do CI partners follow the contact point without getting all tangled up? By investing their centers, so their balance is at stake.
What I mean by "investing your center" is counterbalancing - leaning into the contact point, just a little is enough, or lightly holding your partner and leaning away - so your balance depends just a bit on the connection. When your balance depends on something, your mind fundamentally factors your situation with respect to that thing into its movement figuring. Learning to invest your center, and to pay close attention to what the contact point tells you about your partner's situation - and your own situation - is a lot of what learning contact improv is about.
Originally, Steve Paxton and others in the Judson Dance Project played with many "scores" - recipes - for exploring collaborative movement improvisations, including using the contact point. Steve was particularly interested in what happened when using the contact point, and decided to investigate that score further. Contact Improvisation grew out of it.
Specific skills, and how they're cultivated, may convey some feel for how it plays out.
Over time, practitioners developed exercises which evoke skills for navigating this unusual territory: ways to deal with gravity, momentum, the floor, the dynamics of communicating through the contact point, and more.
- Sharing Balance by Sharing Centers
Counterbalancing is familiar in most kinds of partner dance - holding each other and leaning away from or towards the shared center of balance, so that any change in position of one affects the other, and vice versa. A little is all it takes - in CI, the amount of weight can vary, from just enough to convey the gist of the cooperation, to taking rides on each other's trajectories, with full weight supported by one another. And anywhere in between.
By sharing centers, partners don't just communicate their movement, they share involvement in it by sharing that most fundamental part of human navigation, balance.
- Working with the Floor
The floor is a constant partner in any dance form. In CI, we use it more ways than other forms do. For instance, falling is specifically avoided in most partner dance forms, but it's a regular part of CI. Learning to meet the floor in ways that redirects vertical momentum to horizontal takes out the sting, converts potential impact into gliding, to dancing. Learning to release into falls, rather than fighting them, is another crucial skill, whether falling together with a partner or not. Rolling on the floor is also an intrinsic part, and rolling with a partner even has a name, in CI: "body surfing".
- Sharing Rides
As the dynamics of sharing balance becomes familiar, partners can sense opportunities one to use each other's support to take rides - a kind of flying that, when done with attunement, can give everyone involved the feel of gliding together through space. (I know that people practicing other partner dance forms will recognize this experience, too.)
- Sharing Weight
Exploring moving together with a shared center, you become acquainted with ways you can use your skeleton, rather than muscles, to support yourself and your partner without strain, and with fluidity. As it becomes ingrained, you can use it to bring rides higher into the air, without using force.
(Learning to act by responding to what you sense, using these skills to fit the moment rather than forcing some result, may be part of what is meant by a motto of one of CI's luminaries, Nancy Stark Smith: "Replace ambition with curiosity.")
- Doing Less, and Stillness
Not only can a CI duet's pace vary, full stillness is not unusual. In some moments, traveling through space is not called for. In other moments, whether or not any travel is called for is not clear. In any of those moments, stillness and continuing to tune into the contact point may be just right.
Stillness is not just a CI movement option. Early on the inventor, Steve Paxton, came to see stillness as a crucial attunement channel. Almost from the start, he shared some exercises that he calls "the stand" and "the small dance". Here's a multi-layered exposition he shared at a CI retreat: Why Standing? Steve Paxton talks about how the Stand relates to Stage Fright and Entrainment in Contact Improvisation.
How CI Practice is Typically Organized, and The Skill of Finding Your Way
While classes and workshops provide opportunities for people to share explorations and insights, most of the practice happens in gatherings, called jams, where it's up to the participants to get themselves ready to find their own dance, and eventually find dances with others, in their own time. This adds another layer of improvisation to the mix - how to start or recognize when a dance is starting, and when it's ready to be done, changing pace to suit either or both of your energy in the moment - it's all material for the collaboration.
Increasingly, a structure called the Underscore has been spreading around jams across the world. Devised and developed by Nancy Stark Smith, that development is being conveyed and continued by all those who practice it. The Underscore adds a layer of organization to the Jam structure, that layer helps jammers feel confident about being together with others in the process of finding their way. The DC Sunday jam has been practicing the Underscore on the first Sunday of each month since the end of 2003. We find that it helps newcomers find ease feeling part of the jam structure, while experienced dancers enjoy the cultivation of greater group spirit and focus without any squelching of the jam's open and improvisatory nature.
Lastly, Play for the Sake of Play
Play for the sake of play - toddler Sophie and father Itay Yatuv at a jam in Ibiza
Though not exactly a skill, yet not exactly not a skill, this is a good topic for wrapping up.
In daily life, it's too rare to find opportunities to really play, use your movement and relational skills that are fun to cultivate but that don't all apply to today's increasingly specialized world. Partner dance offers this opportunity. CI adds a twist - making more choices about the overall shape of the cooperation part of the collaboration. The pace, how energetic the dance is, many aspects are constantly negotiated by the partners, seeking levels that suit each of them and that change as their needs change. It can all vary dramatically throughout the course of a single dance. How to respect what's going on in yourself, while also being attentive to your partner, this combination is a key skill for cooperating. Applicable to any kind of improvisation!
Paradoxically, you may discover while doing CI that it helps to be willing to be a bit awkward, to stumble rather than fighting imbalance, and by yielding to it find balance and flow. This lesson may be the one that's made the most difference for me, and that I continue to rediscover.
If any of this sounds intriguing, if you think you might enjoy these challenges and opportunities, please check it out. I'll be conducting a class on Sunday of Interfusion 2017, along the lines of the skills and exercises that I touch on above. You can also find details about the weekly DC CI jam at dccontactimprov.net, which happens every Sunday, rain or shine. For more that I've written about CI, see https://myriadicity.net/contact-improvisation, and visit the site of CI's periodical, the Contact Quarterly, for a central spot in the Contact Improv universe.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License . You may copy and share it freely, but must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.